The Left Wing's Post Election Gun Plans

"Why would an honest person even want a gun?"
by Alan Korwin, Author
Gun Laws of America, October 16, 2006

It’s time to remember what the Democrat party generally seeks regarding guns and gun rights. The list below was widely circulated while Clinton was in power. The democrat-backed Brady group and similar outfits have been quiet about guns because they want to win the election, and get to impose their goals on your rights --

THE (DEMOCRAT) FIVE YEAR PLAN:

1. National Licensing of all handgun purchases.
2. Licenses for Rifle and Shotgun owners.
3. State Licenses for ownership of firearms.
4. Arsenal Licenses (5 guns and 250 rounds of ammunition).
5. Arsenal License Fees (at least $300.00, with a cap of $1,000.00).
6. Limits on Arsenal Licensing (None in counties with populations of more than 200,000).
7. Requirement of Federally Approved Storage Safes for all guns.
8. Inspection License. (Gun safe licenses, yearly fee for spot inspections).
9. Ban on Manufacturing in counties with a population of more than 200,000.
10. Banning all military style firearms.

11. Banning Machine Gun Parts or parts which can be used in a Machine gun.
12. Banning the carrying a firearm anywhere but home or target range or in transit from one to the other.
13. Banning replacement parts (manufacturing, sale, possession, transfer, installation) except barrel, trigger group.
14. Elimination of the Curio Relic list.
15. Control of Ammunition belonging to Certain Surplus Firearms. (7.62x54R and .303).
16. Eventual Ban of Handgun Possession..
17. Banning of Any ammo that fits military guns (post 1945).
18. Banning of any quantity of smokeless powder or black powder which would constitute more than the equivalent of 100 rounds of ammunition.
19. Ban the possession of explosive powders of more than 1 kg. at any one time.
20. Banning of High Powered Ammo or Wounding ammo.
21. A National License for Ammunition.
22. Banning or strict licensing of all re-loading components.
23. National Registration of ammunition or ammo buyers.
24. Requirements of special storage safe for ammunition and licensing.
25. Restricting Gun Ranges to counties with populations less than 200,000.
26. Special Licensing of ranges.
27. Special Range Tax to visitors. ($85.00 per visit per person).
28. Waiting period for rentals on pistol ranges.
29. Banning Gun Shows.
30. Banning of military reenactments.

PLUS:
Ban of all clips holding over 6 bullets.
Elimination of the Dept. of Civilian Marksmanship.
Ban on all realistic replica and toy guns (including "air soft" and paintball).

PLUS:
The right of gun-violence victims to sue, with financial assistance from government programs, the gun manufacturers.
Taxes on ammo, dealers, guns, licenses to offset medical costs to society.
The eventual ban on all semi-automatics regardless of when made or caliber.

While it’s true Republicans haven’t done very much to defend your gun rights (OK, they have done a little) in six years of control, they offer little support for the anti-rights disarm-the-public plans the left wing will impose on you if they gain power in the next election. It’s your choice. Do you stay home and evaporate your rights, or go out and defend them at the ballot box? Tell your friends.

Easy to forget after six years of Republican rule

If you took the bait and voted early, instead of rising up as a whole and voting on election day like you’re supposed to, this message is too late and you got screwed.

Thanks for reading.
Permission to circulate this message gladly granted.
Alan Korwin, Author
Gun Laws of America

Link to an excellent website and the original article:
http://www.gunlaws.com/index.htm

Red State Patriot commentary:

The liberal gun control lobby just won’t quit, any more than the homosexual, anti-Christian, cut and run, income redistribution for votes, amnesty for illegal aliens, anti-military, anti-national defense, socialized medicine, wildly progressive taxation, dumbing down of Americans, politically correct, attempts to concentrate power in the hands of liberals will quit.

As a retired Arizona police officer, after having faced illegal immigration and rampant crime for what feels like a lifetime, I can unequivocally tell you gun violence studies of the past two decades have been based on blatantly flawed methodology cynically knowing the populace wouldn’t know the difference. The few remaining studies were unduly influenced by arrogant liberal political agendas. The predictable study outcomes were biased conclusions incapable of statistical or medical substantiation. Democrats in particular and liberals in general arrogantly think we are too stupid to know the difference. You should be intellectually offended - but hopefully because you are reading this that begs the question.

Even the Medical Sentinel, the official Journal of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, argued in 2001 that many of those individuals and groups who conducted these “gun” studies decided in advance what they wanted to prove, and then began their study "prejudiced" by their goal. The studies were not objective, either intuitively or scientifically. Here are a few examples of widely accepted claims based on tainted studies promoted by anti-gun special-interest groups that attempt to turn public perception of daylight into darkness:

• Women are in more danger if they own or carry guns. The truth is: women, in particular, are NOT in more danger if they carry or own guns.
• The ease of access to or availability of guns is the cause of crime. The truth is: access to or availability of guns is NOT the cause of crime.
• Mass killings could be avoided if guns were not available. The truth is: mass killings will be avoided more often if guns are available.
• Gun violence is the leading accidental cause of death of children. The truth is: only someone deaf, dumb, blind and brain dead at birth would believes assertions that are statistically the opposite of the truth. It would appear only conservatives recognize or care about the truth.

The “health establishment's” stated and unambiguous objective in 1979 was "total eradication of handguns in the United States." Nothing in that Democratic Party agenda has changed and gun-control ideologues are not taking prisoners. Every officially-sanctioned follow-up study since 1979 has been influenced by the “eradication” objective. Extrapolating, so will future gun-control studies by similar groups of agenda-driven social engineers who seek power and want to be unafraid of citizen rebellion.

Almost predictably, scientific corruption is once again solely of liberal orientation. Gun control is no different than any other form of social engineering. By promulgating preordained research that claims an inverse correlation between the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms and national public safety, liberals hold true to tradition and belief that the end justifies the means. The truth is that the Democratic Party’s pre-ordained gun control agenda is absent not only facts and a basis in reality, but Constitutional justification – assuming the U.S. Constitution still means anything to anybody but a conservative.

What you need to know is that much of the information you receive from the liberal ideological research and media reporting regarding gun control is intentionally tainted, result-oriented, and based on what can only be characterized as inaccurate data, predetermined outcomes and poor science. Calling it science is a huge stretch of sanity. You would best serve your own interests to visit Alan Corbin’s website on a regular basis.

Red State Patriot

Posted October 16, 2006 06:31 PM
Read more on Gun Control