Topics

America the Beautiful

Arizona

Articles - Alan Caruba

Articles - American Thinker

Articles - Ann Coulter

Articles - Ben Johnson

Articles - Burt Prelutsky

Articles - Caroline Glick

Articles - Charles Krauthammer

Articles - Chuck Baldwin

Articles - Cliff Kincaid

Articles - Craig Cantoni

Articles - David Horowitz

Articles - David Limbaugh

Articles - David Roth

Articles - Frank Salvato

Articles - Frosty Wooldridge

Articles - Gabriel Garnica

Articles - IBD

Articles - James Taranto

Articles - Jerome R. Corsi

Articles - John W. Howard

Articles - Jonathan Tobin

Articles - MIchelle Malkin

Articles - Mac Johnson

Articles - Mark Steyn

Articles - Michael Reagan

Articles - Mike S. Adams

Articles - Newt Gingrich

Articles - Patrick Buchanan

Articles - Peggy Noonan

Articles - Phyllis Schlafly

Articles - Raymond Kraft

Articles - Red State Patriot

Articles - Sandra J. Miller

Articles - Sultan Knish

Articles - Thomas Sowell

Articles - Tom DeWeese

Articles - Tony Blankley

Articles - WSJ

Articles - Walter E. Willliams

Articles - William C. Douglas

Articles Laura Ingraham

Budget, Taxation and Fiscal Policy

Candidate - Barack Obama

Candidate - John McCain

Candidate - Sarah Palin

Congress

Congressional Spending & Earmarks

Constitution and Government

Domestic Issues and Politics

Economics and Business

Education

Energy

Entertainment

Environment

Featured Cartoons

Financial Market Commentary

Foreign Policy

Gender and Race

Gun Control

Humor

Immigration and Border Control

Iraq

Islam, Terrorism and WMD

Israel and Middle East

Law and Legal Issues

Media and Entertainment

Medicine and Healthcare

NAU & New World Order

National Defense and National Security

Philosophy

Political Thought

Public Service Announcement

Religion and Culture

Social Security

Socialism

Supreme Court

Technology

Trade and Commerce

U.S. Armed Forces

Video

Welfare and the Entitlement Culture

Search


Archives

September 2010
August 2010
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006

Tancredo Letter to Mexican President Calderon

Tancredo.jpg
Press Releases :: February 14, 2008

Tancredo Letter to Mexican President Calderon

( WASHINGTON, D.C. ) – Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Littleton) today sent a letter to Mexican President Felipe Calderon questioning the motives behind his current visit to the United States as well as the charges levied by Mr. Calderon against the fairness of American immigration policy. A copy of the letter is below:

President Calderon:

I was disappointed by misguided comments you recently made regarding U.S.-Mexico relations and U.S. immigration laws. Purveying misinformation and absurd allegations is hardly a positive step to building a constructive partnership.

According to the Associated Press you recently said, “You have two economies. One economy is intensive in capital, which is the American economy. One economy is intensive in labor, which is the Mexican economy. We are two complementary economies, and that phenomenon is impossible to stop.” Yes, both countries benefit by the 85% of Mexico’s manufacturing exports that come to the U.S., but people are not commodities. While I appreciate your concern for our joint prosperity, the economic and social ills that plague your country cannot be resolved by simply exporting your citizens to the United States.

It is undeniable that Mexico faces major challenges. Endemic corruption and the power of violent drug cartels still dominate everyday life across Mexico. Beyond the headlines, Mexico has deep institutional maladies. Mexico’s absurdly antiquated Napoleonic-inquisition styled legal system and the squandering of robust energy-industry opportunity by a poorly managed, state-run Pemex monopoly are just two examples of the kind of self-inflicted wounds that hobble your troubled nation.

I understand that you are attempting to resolve some of these problems and applaud your leadership in trying to do so. But what would contribute more to the long term stability of your economy and your country would be to focus more energy on addressing your domestic challenges and less on lobbying the U.S. to provide amnesty for Mexicans who have illegally entered this country with the blessing of your government. In doing so, you might be able to keep Mexico’s “best and brightest young men” in Mexico – where they can contribute more to Mexico’s economy than remittance payments. Unfortunately, your recent comments indicate that Mexico will continue its policy of encouraging illegal immigration and treating the United States as little more than a dumping ground for your social and economic problems.

In your speech yesterday to the California State legislature, you lectured the American people on how to improve our immigration policies. Why did you not propose that we model our policies on Mexico’s own policies toward illegal entry across your own southern border? Mexico expends enormous resources to prevent Guatemalans, Hondurans and Salvadorans from entering the country illegally, but you castigate the United States for wanting secure borders. Mr. President, in my neighborhood that is called hypocrisy.

You proposed in your Sacramento speech that “migration” be made “legal, safe and organized.” Mr. President, we already have such a program and it is called legal immigration. Over one million legal immigrants come through our ports of entry each year, not across our border fences. The American people set limits on the number of legal immigrants through our immigration laws, and it is not the job of the Mexican government to revise or expand those limits.

President Calderon, you are insulting the American people when you tell us that fifteen to twenty million illegal aliens in our country bring only benefits and no costs. I challenge you to give one concrete example of how the enforcement of our existing immigration laws violates anyone’s human rights. The people of Oklahoma are not anti-Mexican for passing laws to require verification of employment eligibility. The people of Indiana are not anti-immigrant for passing laws to require photo identification for voting. The people of California are not anti-Mexican for denying driver’s licenses to illegal aliens. The people of Arizona are not anti-immigrant for passing laws that deny welfare benefits to people who are in that state unlawfully.

It is no secret that the purpose of your visit is to influence the American election, and in fact your trip has been billed as a high-stakes effort to shape the immigration debate underway in the U.S. presidential race. What is perhaps more disappointing, however, is your attempt to insinuate that anti-amnesty sentiment here in the U.S. is the same as anti-Mexican sentiment. I am referring to your statement, “I need to change in the perception that the Americans are the enemy, and it is important to change the perception that the Mexicans are the enemy.”

It is both disingenuous and dangerous for you to inject this kind of xenophobia into this debate. The fact that the overwhelming majority of Americans support the enforcement of our immigration laws and take issue with the notion that we should reward illegal behavior, hardly qualifies as ethnic animosity or international enmity. What you must understand is that a treasured aspect of our national foundation is a respect for the rule of law. Perhaps if corruption were not so widespread and commonplace in Mexico, it would be easier for you to understand this.

President Calderon, in many ways your trip thus far has been a long series of mixed messages. You accuse the United States of recent protectionist trends, yet you heavily restrict foreign entry into Mexico’s energy sector through a massive, state-run Pemex monopoly. You assure American politicians that an open flow of cheap Mexican labor is not only benign but vitally necessary, but you take great care in securing your own southern border with Guatemala. You come to the United States purportedly to promote better political and economic ties with the U.S., but then issue a thinly veiled threat that Mexicans will regard the U.S. as an enemy if we refuse to provide millions of illegal aliens with unconditional amnesty.

President Calderon, I respectfully suggest that the next time you visit our country, rather than trying to influence U.S. policymakers or our election process, you take time to listen to Americans rather than lecture them. If you want to make changes in government policies, apply your energies to Mexico’s laundry list of problems rather than meddling in domestic American politics.

-------------------------
Comments are welcome at redstatepatriot@hughes.net. Please include the title of the article as your subject line. Selected responses, in whole or part, may be published (appended to the article).

Posted February 17, 2008 11:40 AM
Read more on Immigration and Border Control

Navigation

About
Submissions
Subscribe
RSS Feed
Home

Recent Articles

Heirs to Fortuyn?

Muslim immigration and sclerotic welfare states push Europe right (sort of). Spring 2009 When the New Left emerged in the...

Read more...

The Left Is Making a Grave Mistake

The Left Is Making a Mistake in Ridiculing the Tea Parties The political Left in the United States is...

Read more...

Government Motors

President of the United States is a job with no shortage of responsibilities, but last week the Obama administration added...

Read more...

Steelers to loose Super Bowl Trophies

ESPN Updated: March 32, 2009 Pittsburgh, PA. The Super Bowl XLIII Champion Pittsburgh Steelers, the only team to win...

Read more...

Welcome to Mississagua



Read more...

Blogroll

Credits

Powered by Movable Type 3.2

Site design by Sekimori